David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 20 (1):63-72 (1970)
Following the lead of daisetz t. Suzuki, The authors of almost all english-Language commentaries on zen buddhism are in general agreement that zen is not a philosophy. The primary purpose of this paper is to show how and why this view is fundamentally mistaken and that the continued espousal of it is counterproductive for furthering an understanding of any facet of zen, Philosophical or otherwise
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Ives (2009). Imperial-Way Zen: Ichikawa Hakugen's Critique and Lingering Questions for Buddhist Ethics. University of Hawai'i Press.
Tamarack Song (2011). Song of Trusting the Heart: A Classic Zen Poem for Daily Meditation. Sentient Publications.
William C. Dell (2010). Deconstructing Zen: Apples and Oranges, Strings and Branes, and the Buddha's Belly. Millennial Mind Pub..
Dale Stuart Wright (1998). Philosophical Meditations on Zen Buddhism. Cambridge University Press.
Hakuin (2012). Beating the Cloth Drum: The Letters of Zen Master Hakuin. Shambhala Publications.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #76,903 of 1,099,048 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #27,186 of 1,099,048 )
How can I increase my downloads?