Metaphilosophy 41 (3):279-291 (2010)
|Abstract||Abstract: Pluralistic ignorance is a nasty informational phenomenon widely studied in social psychology and theoretical economics. It revolves around conditions under which it is "legitimate" for everyone to remain ignorant. In formal epistemology there is enough machinery to model and resolve situations in which pluralistic ignorance may arise. Here is a simple first stab at recovering from pluralistic ignorance by means of knowledge transmissibility.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nancy Tuana (2006). The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women's Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Hypatia 21 (3):1-19.
Robert Fiengo (2007). Asking Questions: Using Meaningful Structures to Imply Ignorance. Oxford ;University Press.
L. L. Farrar (2003). In Praise of Ignorance. Critical Review 15 (3-4):339-346.
Stuart Firestein (2012). Ignorance: How It Drives Science. Oxford University Press.
Rik Peels (2010). What is Ignorance? Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
Pierre Le Morvan (2011). On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels. Philosophia 39 (2):335-344.
Pierre le Morvan (2011). Knowledge, Ignorance and True Belief. Theoria 77 (1):32-41.
Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, Anthony R. Wheeler & M. Ronald Buckley (2005). Everybody Else is Doing It, so Why Can't We? Pluralistic Ignorance and Business Ethics Education. Journal of Business Ethics 56 (4):385 - 398.
Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, M. Ronald Buckley & Nicole D. Sauer (2004). The Role of Pluralistic Ignorance in Perceptions of Unethical Behavior: An Investigation of Attorneys' and Students' Perceptions of Ethical Behavior. Ethics and Behavior 14 (1):17 – 30.
Added to index2010-04-20
Total downloads24 ( #52,493 of 556,895 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,428 of 556,895 )
How can I increase my downloads?