Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistle-blowers

Abstract Existing whistle-blowing models rely on “cold” economic calculations and cost-benefit analyses to explain the judgments and actions of potential whistle-blowers. I argue that “hot” cognitions – value conflict and emotions – should be added to these models. I propose a model of the whistle-blowing decision process that highlights the reciprocal influence of “hot” and “cold” cognitions and advocate research that explores how value conflict and emotions inform reporting decisions. I draw on the cognitive appraisal approach to emotions and on the social-functional value pluralism model to generate propositions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,631
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Mathieu Bouville (2008). Whistle-Blowing and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):579 - 585.
    Colin Grant (2002). Whistle Blowers: Saints of Secular Culture. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):391 - 399.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    23 ( #53,739 of 548,974 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,511 of 548,974 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums