David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Political Theory 33 (6):763 - 785 (2005)
While claims for the return of expropriated land by Native Americans and other indigenous peoples are often evaluated using legal frameworks, such approaches fail to engage the fundamental moral questions involved. This essay outlines three justifications for Native Americans to pursue land claims: to regain properties where original ownership has not been superseded, to aid the long-term survival of their endangered cultures, and to challenge and revise the historical misremembering of mainstream American society. The third justification is most controversial. It asserts that understandings of history shape perceptions of the present, and that intensively pursued land claims can provide powerful challenges to inaccurate conceptions of the past. This essay argues that Native Americans are for this reason justified in strategically pursuing land claims that are difficult to justify on other grounds, and closes with some worries about the legitimate role of strategy in political action.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Bashir Bashir (2012). Reconciling Historical Injustices: Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (2):127-143.
Similar books and articles
Scott L. Pratt (2001). The Given Land: Black Hawk's Conception of Place. Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):109 – 125.
Bonita Lawrence (2003). Gender, Race, and the Regulation of Native Identity in Canada and the United States: An Overview. Hypatia 18 (2):3-31.
Debra A. Tolliver, Issues Facing Native American and Alaska Native Women Living with Domestic Violence.
Michael K. Green (1993). Images of Native Americans in Advertising: Some Moral Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):323 - 330.
Susan Dodds (1998). Justice and Indigenous Land Rights. Inquiry 41 (2):187 – 205.
Burke A. Hendrix (2012). Political Theorists as Dangerous Social Actors. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (1):41-61.
Hillel Steiner & Jonathan Wolff (2006). Disputed Land Claims: A Response to Weatherson and to Bou-Habib and Olsaretti. Analysis 66 (291):248–255.
Brian Weatherson (2003). Nine Objections to Steiner and Wolff on Land Disputes. Analysis 63 (4):321–327.
M. Annette Jaimes (2003). "Patriarchal Colonialism" and Indigenism: Implications for Native Feminist Spirituality and Native Womanism. Hypatia 18 (2):58-69.
M. A. Jaimes*Guerrero (2003). "Patriarchal Colonialism" and Indigenism: Implications for Native Feminist Spirituality and Native Womanism. Hypatia 18 (2):58 - 69.
Rose Cuison Villazor (2008). Blood Quantum Land Laws and the Race Versus Political Identity Dilemma. California Law Review 96:801-838.
Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette (1988). Agriculture, Ethics, and Restrictions on Property Rights. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):21-40.
Brian David Thom, Coast Salish Senses of Place : Dwelling, Meaning, Power, Property and Territory in the Coast Salish World.
H. F. Tozer (1888). The Native Land of Horace. The Classical Review 2 (1-2):13-17.
Annie L. Booth & Harvey L. Jacobs (1990). Ties That Bind: Native American Beliefs as a Foundation for Environmental Consciousness. Environmental Ethics 12 (1):27-43.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads16 ( #228,336 of 1,906,921 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,921 )
How can I increase my downloads?