Ordinary language, common sense, and the time-lag argument
Mind 76 (301):21-33 (1967)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. Coates (1996). The Claims of Common Sense: Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
George Pitcher (1971). A Theory Of Perception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Massimiliano Carrara & Achille C. Varzi (2001). Ontological Commitment and Reconstructivism. Erkenntnis 55 (1):33-50.
Achille Varzi (2001). Ontological Commitment and Reconstructivism. Erkenntnis 55 (1):33 - 50.
Heather Dyke (2011). The Evolutionary Origins of Tensed Language and Belief. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):401-418.
Michael De Medeiros (2010). Common Sense. Weigl Publishers.
Gerald E. Myers (1957). Perception and the 'Time-Lag' Argument. Analysis 17 (April):97-102.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Sean Enda Power (2013). Perceiving External Things and the Time-Lag Argument. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):94-117.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,037 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
