David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 15 (4):345-353 (1993)
Following discussions by Callicott and Zimmerman, I argue that much of deep ecology’s critique of science is based on an outdated image of natural science. The significance of the quantum revolution for environmental issues does not lie in its alleged intrusion of the subjective consciousness into the physicists’ description of nature. Arguing from the viewpoint of Niels Bohr’s framework of complementarity,I conclude that Bohr’s epistemological lesson teaches that the object of description in physical science must be interaction and that it is now mistaken to imagine that physical science aims to represent nature in terms of properties it possesses apart from interaction
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward MacKinnon (1986). Book Review:The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity Henry J. Folse. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 53 (3):458-.
Klaus Meyer-Abich (2004). Bohr's Complementarity and Goldstein's Holism in Reflective Pragmatism. Mind and Matter 2 (2):91-103.
Henry J. Folse (1985). The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
S. Müller‐Markus (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy∗. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73-93.
M. S. (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73 – 93.
Michael Cuffaro (2010). The Kantian Framework of Complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):309-317.
Henry J. Folse (1986). Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:96 - 104.
John Honner (1987). The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #241,511 of 1,696,545 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #343,026 of 1,696,545 )
How can I increase my downloads?