Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 129 (2):317-33 (2006)
|Abstract||The frame problem is the problem of how we selectively apply relevant knowledge to particular situations in order to generate practical solutions. Some philosophers have thought that the frame problem can be used to rule out, or argue in favor of, a particular theory of belief states. But this is a mistake. Sentential theories of belief are no better or worse off with respect to the frame problem than are alternative theories of belief, most notably, the “map” theory of belief.|
|Keywords||Belief Epistemology Frame Map Sentence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson (1996). Fodor's Frame Problem and Relevance Theory (Reply to Chiappe & Kukla). .
W. F. G. Haselager & J. F. H. Van Rappard (1998). Connectionism, Systematicity, and the Frame Problem. Minds and Machines 8 (2):161-179.
Eric Lormand (1990). Framing the Frame Problem. Synthese 82 (3):353-74.
Scott Hendricks (2006). Sententialism and the Problem of Clutter. Acta Analytica 21 (40):74-84.
L. Crockett (1994). The Turing Test and the Frame Problem: AI's Mistaken Understanding of Intelligence. Ablex.
Hamid Vahid (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zenon Pylyshyn (1996). The Frame Problem Blues. Once More, with Feeling. In K. M. Ford & Z. W. Pylyshyn (eds.), The Robot's Dilemma Revisited: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Ablex.
Kevin B. Korb (1998). The Frame Problem: An AI Fairy Tale. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 8 (3):317-351.
Mark Sprevak (2005). The Frame Problem and the Treatment of Prediction. In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads92 ( #9,296 of 738,966 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,966 )
How can I increase my downloads?