The work of art
Journal of Philosophy 54 (14):429-442 (1957)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesK. Gover (2008). The Overlooked Work of Art in “the Origin of the Work of Art”. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):143-153.
Nicholas Maxwell (2003). Art as Its Own Interpretation. In Andreea Ruvoi (ed.), Interpretation and Its Objects: Studies in the Philosophy of Michael Krausz. Rodopi.
Wassily Kandinsky (1947/1979). Point and Line to Plane. Dover Publications.
Csaba Olay (2008). Gadamers Hermeneutische Kunstauffassung. Estetika 45 (2).
Donald Kuspit (1995). Art and Capital: An Ironic Dialectic. Critical Review 9 (4):465-482.
Clementina Red (2012). Specular Phenomenology: Art and Art Criticism. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (2):248-260.
Adrian Carr & Philip Hancock (eds.) (2003). Art and Aesthetics at Work. Palgrave Macmillan.
Donald F. Henze (1955). Is the Work of Art a Construct? A Reply to Professor Pepper. Journal of Philosophy 52 (16):433-439.
Donald F. Henze (1961). The "Look" of a Work of Art. Philosophical Quarterly 11 (45):360-365.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,930 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
