Studia Logica 84 (2) (2006)
|Abstract||'Possible worlds' have been one of the true conundrum notions in philosophy. On the hand possible worlds have proved very useful in philosophical logic for obtaining significant formal results with sunbstantial philosophical import. Yet on the other they have generated much noise and commotion in especially metaphysics and epistemology. From a logical point of view they are useful tools or conceptual constructions, from a philosophical point of view troublesome entitites generating endless discussions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Louis deRosset (2009). Possible Worlds II: Non-Reductive Theories of Possible Worlds. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):1009-1021.
D. M. Armstrong (1989). A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility. Cambridge University Press.
David A. Denby (2008). Generating Possibilities. Philosophical Studies 141 (2):191 - 207.
Phillip Bricker (2006). David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds. In John Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, Vol. 5: The Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Acumen Publishing.
Greg Restall (1997). Ways Things Can't Be. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):583-596.
Jeffrey C. King (2007). What in the World Are the Ways Things Might Have Been? [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 133 (3):443 - 453.
Edward N. Zalta (1997). A Classically-Based Theory of Impossible Worlds. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):640-660.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #74,618 of 549,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,706 of 549,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?