David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Global Ethics 6 (3):239-254 (2010)
National minority women’s defense of nonliberal minority cultures that encompass sexist customs and rules has greatly perplexed liberal theorists. Many attempted to resolve this puzzle by attributing constrained agency to such women and dismissing their defense as unreasonable. This article argues that this liberal assessment of minority women’s position is philosophically indefensible and that the failure of mainstream liberalism to make sense of these women’s response indicates not that these women’s agency is compromised but rather that the liberal conception of agency as autonomy at the heart of the liberal framework has limits in its crosscultural applicability. A conception of agency, valuational agency, that illuminates minority women’s agency is proposed as a more plausible alternative for radically pluralistic societies. -/- .
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Raz (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1988). The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Charles Taylor (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sumi Madhok (2007). Autonomy, Gendered Subordination and Transcultural Dialogue. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):335 – 357.
Herjeet Marway (2011). Scandalous Subwomen and Sublime Superwomen: Exploring Portrayals of Female Suicide Bombers' Agency. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):221-240.
Paul Benson (1990). Feminist Second Thoughts About Free Agency. Hypatia 5 (3):47 - 64.
Sylvia Burrow (2009). Bodily Limits to Autonomy : Emotion, Attitude, and Self-Defense. In Sue Campbell, Letitia Meynell & Susan Sherwin (eds.), Embodiment and Agency. Pennsylvania State University Press
Mark Young & Andrew Sneddon (2011). Communitarian and Liberal Themes in Moral Agency and Education. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):105-120.
N. Stoljar (2011). Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Keya Maitra (2013). The Questions of Identity and Agency in Feminism Without Borders: A Mindful Response. Hypatia 28 (2):360-376.
Carol A. Chetkovich (2004). Women's Agency in a Context of Oppression: Assessing Strategies for Personal Action and Public Policy. Hypatia 19 (4):120-141.
Shaun Gallagher (2010). Multiple Aspects of Agency. New Ideas in Psychology.
Marina A. L. Oshana (2005). Autonomy and Free Agency. In Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Michael Bratman (2007). Structures of Agency: Essays. Oxford University Press.
Donald J. Musacchio (2005). Divine and Human Agency in the Work of Social Justice. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:279-288.
Brackette F. Williams (ed.) (1996). Women Out of Place: The Gender of Agency and the Race of Nationality. Routledge.
Shaun Gallagher (2007). The Natural Philosophy of Agency. Philosophy Compass 2 (2):347–357.
M. Synofzik, G. Vosgerau & A. Newen (2008). Beyond the Comparator Model: A Multi-Factorial Two-Step Account of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):219-239.
Added to index2010-12-08
Total downloads28 ( #136,808 of 1,793,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,411 of 1,793,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?