Leaders and laggards: The influence of competing logics on corporate environmental action [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):449 - 472 (2009)
|Abstract||We study the sources of resistance to change among firms in the Canadian petroleum industry in response to a shift in societal level logics related to corporate environmental performance. Despite challenges to its legitimacy as a result of poor environmental performance, the Canadian petroleum industry was divided as to how to respond, with some members ignoring the concerns and resisting change (i.e., laggards) while others took action to ensure continued legitimacy (i.e., leaders). We examine why organizations within the same institutional field responded differently, delaying the industry response. We found that one population of firms was aligned with increasing pressures from its stakeholders for improved environmental performance, and the other was influenced by local cultural, political, and economic ideals less demanding of environmental actions. Our results reveal that several factors both at the institutional field level and the organizational level affected how these two populations reacted to a changing societal logic. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.|
|Keywords||environmental performance environmental reporting institutional logics legitimacy corporate responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Denis Cormier, Irene M. Gordon & Michel Magnan (2004). Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2):143-165.
Peter A. Stanwick & Sarah D. Stanwick (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):195-204.
Richard H. Guerrette (1986). Environmental Integrity and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):409 - 415.
Charles H. Cho, Dennis M. Patten & Robin W. Roberts (2006). Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation Between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):139 - 154.
Jijun Gao & Pratima Bansal (2013). Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):241-255.
Ching-Hsun Chang (2011). The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):361-370.
Cheng-Li Huang & Fan-Hua Kung (2010). Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence From Taiwan. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):435 - 451.
Cedric E. Dawkins & John W. Fraas (2010). Beyond Acclamations and Excuses: Environmental Performance, Voluntary Environmental Disclosure, and the Role of Visibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4):655.
Tiina Johanna Onkila (2009). Corporate Argumentation for Acceptability: Reflections of Environmental Values and Stakeholder Relations in Corporate Environmental Statements. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):285 - 298.
Olivier Boiral, Mario Cayer & Charles M. Baron (2009). The Action Logics of Environmental Leadership: A Developmental Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):479 - 499.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,403 of 735,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?