Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):342-343 (2004)
|Abstract||A key premise of the heuristics-and-biases program is that heuristics are “quite useful.” Let us now pay more than lip service to this premise, and analyse the environmental structures that make heuristics more or less useful. Let us also strike from the long list of biases those phenomena that are not biases and explore to what degree those that remain are adaptive or can be understood as by-products of adaptive mechanisms.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Magnus (1996). Heuristics and Biases in Evolutionary Biology. Biology and Philosophy 12 (1).
John Wettersten (1998). Review Symposium on Searle : III. The Analytical Study of Social Ontology: Breakthrough or Cul-de-Sac? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (1):132-151.
Annika Wallin & Peter Gärdenfors (2000). Smart People Who Make Simple Heuristics Work. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-765.
Mark Alfano (2011). Explaining Away Intuitions About Traits: Why Virtue Ethics Seems Plausible (Even If It Isn't). Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):121-136.
Durant Drake (1917). A Cul-de-Sac for Realism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 14 (14):365-373.
Fred I. Dretske (1982). A Cognitive Cul-de-Sac. Mind 91 (361):109-111.
Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.
David C. Funder (2000). Gone with the Wind: Individual Differences in Heuristics and Biases Undermine the Implication of Systematic Irrationality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):673-674.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #202,056 of 549,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?