Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):373-385 (2005)
|Abstract||Engineering ethics entails three frames of reference: individual, professional, and social. “Microethics” considers individuals and internal relations of the engineering profession; “macroethics” applies to the collective social responsibility of the profession and to societal decisions about technology. Most research and teaching in engineering ethics, including online resources, has had a “micro” focus. Mechanisms for incorporating macroethical perspectives include: integrating engineering ethics and science, technology and society (STS); closer integration of engineering ethics and computer ethics; and consideration of the influence of professional engineering societies and corporate social responsiblity programs on ethical engineering practice. Integrating macroethical issues and concerns in engineering ethics involves broadening the context of ethical problem solving. This in turn implies: developing courses emphasizing both micro and macro perspectives, providing faculty development that includes training in both STS and practical ethics; and revision of curriculum materials, including online resources. Multidisciplinary collaboration is recommended 1) to create online case studies emphasizing ethical decision making in individual, professional, and societal contexts; 2) to leverage existing online computer ethics resources with relevance to engineering education and practice; and 3) to create transparent linkages between public policy positions advocated by professional societies and codes of ethics.|
|Keywords||Macroethics STS professional societies corporate responsibility engineering ethics ethical problem solving online resources|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Armin Grunwald (2001). The Application of Ethics to Engineering and the Engineer's Moral Responsibility: Perspectives for a Research Agenda. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):415-428.
Michael Davis (2006). Integrating Ethics Into Technical Courses: Micro-Insertion. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):717-730.
Andrew Lau (2004). Teaching Engineering Ethics to First-Year College Students. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):359-368.
Michael Pritchard & Mark Holtzapple (1997). Responsible Engineering: Gilbane Gold Revisited. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):217-230.
Charles Glagola, Moshe Kam, Caroline Whitebeck & Michael C. Loui (1997). Teaching Ethics in Engineering and Computer Science: A Panel Discussion. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):463-480.
Michael J. Rabins (1998). Teaching Engineering Ethics to Undergraduates: Why? What? How? [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):291-302.
Susan Magun-Jackson (2004). A Psychological Model That Integrates Ethics in Engineering Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):219-224.
Eddie Conlon & Henk Zandvoort (2011). Broadening Ethics Teaching in Engineering: Beyond the Individualistic Approach. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):217-232.
Simon Robinson (ed.) (2007). Engineering, Business and Professional Ethics. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Joseph R. Herkert (2001). Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):403-414.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,372 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?