David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1) (1993)
The terms health, disease and illness are frequently used in clinical medicine. This has misled philosophers into believing that these concepts are important for clinical thinking and decision making. For instance, it is held that decisions about whether or not to treat someone or whether to relieve someone of moral responsibility depend on whether the person has a disease. In this paper it is argued that the crucial role of the disease concept is illusory. The health/disease distinction is irrelevant for most decisions and represents a conceptual straightjacket. Sophisticated and mature clinical decision making requires that we free ourselves from the concept of disease.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark Ereshefsky (2009). Defining 'Health' and 'Disease'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 40 (3):221-227.
Matthis Synofzik (2009). Ethically Justified, Clinically Applicable Criteria for Physician Decision-Making in Psychopharmacological Enhancement. Neuroethics 2 (2):89-102.
Andrew Miles & Michael Loughlin (2009). Philosophy, Freedom and the Public Good: A Review and Analysis of 'Public Health Ethics' Holland, S. (2007). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (5):838-858.
Hartmut Bettin, Alexander Spassov & Micha H. Werner (forthcoming). Asymmetrien Bei der Einschätzung des Kieferorthopädischen BehandlungsbedarfsAsymmetries of the Public and Providers Views of the Orthodontic Treatment Need Orthodontic Practice and Orthodontic Standards as an Area of Conflicts Between Patients, Physicians and Society. Ethik in der Medizin.
Matthis Synofzik (2006). Kognition à la carte? Ethik in der Medizin 18 (1):37-50.
Similar books and articles
Manuel Varela, Raul Ruiz-Esteban & Maria Jose Mestre de Juan (2010). Chaos, Fractals, and Our Concept of Disease. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):584-595.
Thomas Schramme (2007). The Significance of the Concept of Disease for Justice in Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh (2000). Fuzzy Health, Illness, and Disease. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):605 – 638.
P. Thagard (1996). The Concept of Disease: Structure and Change. Philosophical Explorations 29:445-478.
Juha Räikkä (1996). The Social Concept of Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
William E. Stempsey (2000). A Pathological View of Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):321-330.
Joachim Widder & Monika Glawischnig-Goschnik (2002). The Concept of Disease in Palliative Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):191-197.
Randolph M. Nesse (2001). On the Difficulty of Defining Disease: A Darwinian Perspective. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):37-46.
George Khushf (1997). Why Bioethics Needs the Philosophy of Medicine: Some Implications of Reflection on Concepts of Health and Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads82 ( #20,786 of 1,692,220 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #25,757 of 1,692,220 )
How can I increase my downloads?