Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):283-311 (2010)
|Abstract||The Literary Format of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy is undoubtedly one of its more distinguishing features. During the seventeenth century, the standard convention for a work in metaphysics was a treatise or disputation. Descartes's conversational tone, writing in the first person present tense, and unique organization of chapters into "meditations," was clearly a departure from the norm. At first glance, given the sentiments expressed in the work's dedicatory letter and preface, the unconventional writing style appears to be a rhetorical device. As architect for the new science, Descartes was certainly eager to gain approval for his philosophical agenda from the proper authorities, such as the ..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Cecilia Wee (2012). Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23 - 40.
René Descartes (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections From the Objections and Replies. Cambridge University Press.
David Scott (2009). Descartes, Madness and Method. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):153-171.
Roger Ariew & Marjorie Glicksman Grene (eds.) (1995). Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. University of Chicago Press.
C. G. Prado (2009). Starting with Descartes. Continuum.
Olli Lagerspetz (2010). Descartes' Error, with Reference to the Third and Fourth Meditations. Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):303-320.
John Peter Carriero (2009). Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes's Meditations. Princeton University Press.
Tom Vinci (2011). Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Added to index2010-06-30
Total downloads17 ( #78,052 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?