Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology

Oxford University Press (2001)
What is knowledge? How hard is it for a person to have knowledge? Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge confronts contemporary philosophical attempts to answer those classic questions, offering a theory of knowledge that is unique in conceiving of knowledge in a non-absolutist way.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $59.99 used (53% off)   $116.12 new (8% off)   $125.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number BD161.H44 2001
ISBN(s) 019924734X   9780199247349
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,938
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
B. J. C. Madison (2011). Combating Anti Anti-Luck Epistemology. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):47-58.
Lisa Miracchi (2015). Competence to Know. Philosophical Studies 172 (1):29-56.
Stephen Hetherington (2012). The Extended Knower. Philosophical Explorations 15 (2):207 - 218.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

45 ( #74,473 of 1,725,631 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #134,602 of 1,725,631 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.