Re: Brains in a vat
Dialectica 54 (4):307–312 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesYuval Steinitz (1994). Brains in a Vat: Different Perspectives. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (175):213-222.
Neil C. Manson (2004). Brains, Vats, and Neurally-Controlled Animats. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (2):249-268.
Gregory McCullogh (2001). Let the Vat-Brains Speak for Themselves. Ratio 14 (4):318–335.
Pavel Tichý (1986). Putnam on Brains in a Vat. Philosophia 16 (2):137-146.
Kirk Ludwig (1992). Brains in a Vat, Subjectivity, and the Causal Theory of Reference. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:313-345.
Anthony Brueckner (1992). If I Am a Brain in a Vat, Then I Am Not a Brain in a Vat. Mind 101 (401):123-128.
Mark Sprevak & Christina McLeish (2004). Magic, Semantics, and Putnam's Vat Brains. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (2):227-236.
Bredo C. Johnsen (2003). Of Brains in Vats, Whatever Brains in Vats May Be. Philosophical Studies 112 (3):225 - 249.
Marian David (1991). Neither Mentioning 'Brains in a Vat' nor Mentioning Brains in a Vat Will Prove That We Are Not Brains in a Vat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):891-896.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads18 ( #67,643 of 549,695 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,695 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
