The natural and the artefactual: The implications of deep science and deep technology for environmental philosophy
Environmental Ethics 23 (4):437-440 (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAriel Salleh (1993). Class, Race, and Gender Discourse in the Ecofeminism/Deep Ecology Debate. Environmental Ethics 15 (3):225-244.
David Keller (1997). Gleaning Lessons From Deep Ecology. Ethics and the Environment 2 (2):139 - 148.
Mick Smith (1999). To Speak of Trees: Social Constructivism, Environmental Values, and the Future of Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):359-376.
Richard A. Watson (1990). George Bradford: How Deep is Deep Ecology? And Return of the Son of Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 12 (4):371-374.
Alan E. Wittbecker (1986). Deep Anthropology. Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270.
Frank B. Golley (1987). Deep Ecology From the Perspective of Environmental Science. Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55.
Deane Curtin (1994). Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self. Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Harold Glasser (1996). Naess's Deep Ecology Approach and Environmental Policy. Inquiry 39 (2):157 – 187.
Colette Sciberras (2002). Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: The Self in Environmental Philosophy. Dissertation, Lancaster
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #234,650 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
