David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 49 (3):235-252 (2004)
Contractualism conceives of firm-stakeholder relations as cooperative schemes for mutual benefit. In essence, contractualism holds that these schemes, as well as the normative principles that guide and constrain them, are ultimately ratified by the consent and endorsement of those subject to them. This paper explores the empirical validity of a contractualist perspective on firm-stakeholder relations. It first develops a typology of firm-stakeholder contracting problems. It subsequently confronts this typology with empirical data collected in an interview study of concrete stakeholder management practices, involving in-depth research interviews with forty-four managers working in the Dutch financial services industry. The findings of this theory-building study suggest that there are limits to the applicability of the contract model in the context of stakeholder management, and that disregarding either the model or its limitations may lead to highly ineffective firm-stakeholder relations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dirk Ulrich Gilbert & Michael Behnam (2009). Advancing Integrative Social Contracts Theory: A Habermasian Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):215 - 234.
Pablo Ruiz, Ricardo Martinez, Job Rodrigo & Cristina Diaz (forthcoming). Level of Coherence Among Ethics Program Components and Its Impact on Ethical Intent. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen (2011). All Animals Are Equal, but …: Management Perceptions of Stakeholder Relationships and Societal Responsibilities in Multinational Corporations. Business Ethics 20 (2):177-191.
Matias Laine (2010). The Nature of Nature as a Stakeholder. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):73-78.
Päivi Myllykangas, Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki (2010). Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What Do We Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):65-72.
Bryan W. Husted (1998). Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):643 - 651.
Steven N. Brenner (1992). The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2):99-119.
Neil A. Shankman (1999). Reframing the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):319 - 334.
Sara A. Morris (1997). Internal Effects of Stakeholder Management Devices. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):413-424.
John Kaler (2003). Differentiating Stakeholder Theories. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (1):71 - 83.
Kalle Pajunen (2010). A “Black Box” of Stakeholder Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):27-32.
Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens & Hans van Oosterhout (2002). The Confines of Stakeholder Management: Evidence From the Dutch Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (4):387 - 403.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #130,070 of 1,102,812 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,777 of 1,102,812 )
How can I increase my downloads?