David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):20-22 (2002)
Michael Polanyi critiqued the then burgeoning field of molecular biology and the neo-Darwinian synthesis that has since come to characterize the structure of modern biology. He pointed out correctly that the reductionistic approach lacked explanatory power in the case of living systems. Philip Clayton addresses the importance of Polanyi’s thinking, even though it was not appreciated at the time it was presented. He argues, however, that while some aspects of Polanyi’s biological perspective are important in considering emergent phenomenon, other ideas are less well received in the modern era. This article discusses the pros and cons of the Clayton view and presents a model for a biological structure that might embrace emergence and supervenience
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philip Rolnick (2002). Regarding Philip Clayton. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):5-6.
Philip Clayton (2002). Emergence, Supervenience, and Personal Knowledge. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):8-19.
Walter B. Gulick (2002). Response to Clayton. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):32-47.
Phil Mullins (2003). Polanyian Footnotes to “From Biology to Consciousness to Morality”. Tradition and Discovery 30 (3):22-30.
Ute Deichmann (2011). Michael Polanyi on Scientific Authority and His Criticism of Popper and Russell. Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 56 (1):249-268.
Struan Jacobs (2006). Michael Polanyi and Thomas Kuhn. Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):25-36.
Gregory R. Peterson (2002). Emergence and Supervenience. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):23-27.
Phil Mullins (2006). Comprehension and the 'Comprehensive Entity'. Tradition and Discovery 33 (3):26-43.
Paul Craig Roberts (2005). Michael Polanyi. Tradition and Discovery 32 (3):15-18.
Frank H. Knight (1949). Virtue and Knowledge: The View of Professor Polanyi:Science, Faith and Society. Michael Polanyi; The Foundations of Academic Freedom. Michael Polanyi. Ethics 59 (4):271-.
Phil Mullins (1999). The Real As Meaningful. Tradition and Discovery 26 (3):42-50.
Richard Henry Schmitt (2006). Darwin, Kuhn, and Polanyi. Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):49-55.
J. S. Pflug (1998). Stephania Jha's Integrative Interpretation of Polanyi. Tradition and Discovery 25 (1):21-24.
Santhi Hejeebu & Deirdre McCloskey (1999). The Reproving of Karl Polanyi. Critical Review 13 (3-4):285-314.
Philip Clayton (2002). Emergence — A Response to My Critics. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):48-51.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads1 ( #424,058 of 1,096,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,068 of 1,096,831 )
How can I increase my downloads?