David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Man and World 30 (4):431-443 (1997)
This paper examines Sartre's dualistic ontology in the light of the non-duality asserted by Mahayana Buddhism. In the first section, I show, against the objection of Hazel E. Barnes, that Sartre and Buddhism have comparable theories of consciousness. The second section discusses Steven W. Laycock's use of Zen philosophy to solve the Sartrean metaphysical problem regarding the origin of being for-itself. This solution involves rejecting the ontological priority of being in-itself in favor of the Buddhist understanding of interdependent origination (pratitya-samutpada) and emptiness (sunyata). Finally, I explain how this aspect of Buddhist thought is consistent with Sartre's ontology, thus making an acceptable solution. This consistency is possible if we understand Sartre's ontology as provisionally true in a sense gleaned from the Madhyamika and Yogacara schools of Indian Buddhism, which were influential to the formation of Zen philosophy
|Keywords||Philosophy Phenomenology Philosophy of Man Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sheridan Hough (2012). Would Sartre Have Suffered From Nausea If He Had Understood the Buddhist No-Self Doctrine? Contemporary Buddhism 13 (1):99-112.
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Mcmahon Railey (1997). Dependent Origination and the Dual-Nature of the Japanese Aesthetic. Asian Philosophy 7 (2):123 – 132.
Chris Brink & Ingrid Rewitzky (2002). Three Dual Ontologies. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):543-568.
Sebastian Gardner (2006). Sartre, Schelling, and Onto-Theology. Religious Studies 42 (3):247-271.
Mark T. Unno (1999). Questions in the Making: A Review Essay on Zen Buddhist Ethics in the Context of Buddhist and Comparative Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):507 - 536.
Mangala R. Chinchore (1995). Aniccatā/Anityatā, an Analysis of Buddhist Opposition to Permanence/Stability and Alternative Foundation of Ontology and/or Anthropology. Sri Satguru Publications.
Masao Abe (1995). Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue: Part One of a Two-Volume Sequel to Zen and Western Thought. University of Hawaiʻi Press.
John W. M. Krummel (2004). Emptiness and Experience: Pure and Impure. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4 (1):57-76.
Adrian Konik (2009). Buddhism and Transgression: The Appropriation of Buddhism in the Contemporary West. Brill.
Tianxiang Ma (2006). Scientific Analysis of Buddhism and a Comparative Study of Buddhism and Science. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):594-629.
Christopher Ives (2009). Imperial-Way Zen: Ichikawa Hakugen's Critique and Lingering Questions for Buddhist Ethics. University of Hawai'i Press.
Charles Muller, Innate Enlightenment and No-Thought: A Response to the Critical Buddhist Position on Zen.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads28 ( #136,550 of 1,792,039 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #119,870 of 1,792,039 )
How can I increase my downloads?