Kinds, Projectibility and Explanation

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):71-87 (2005)
Two ways of characterizing natural kinds are currently popular: the Kripke-Putnam appeal to microstructure and Boyd’s appeal to causal homeostasis. I argue that these conceptions are more divergent than is often acknowledged, that they give no credence to essentialism, and that they are both faulty. In their place, I sketch an alternative view of natural kinds, which I call “bare projectibilism”. This conception avoids the appeal to explanation common to microstructuralism and the causal homeostasis view, but is still compatible with scientific realism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI croatjphil20055141
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,305
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
David Ludwig (2015). Indigenous and Scientific Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axv031.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

41 ( #116,174 of 1,932,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #114,864 of 1,932,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.