The international provision of pharmaceuticals: a comparison of two alternative argumentative strategies for global ethics

Journal of Global Ethics 7 (1):73 - 89 (2011)
Abstract
Millions of people in the developing world lack access to curative drugs. Pogge identifies the cause of this problem as a lack of redistribution across borders. In contrast, this article shows that institutional shortcomings within developing countries are the main issue. These different explanations are the result of diverging analytic approaches to ethics: a cosmopolitan approach versus an ordonomic approach. This article compares both approaches with regard to how they conceptualize and propose to solve the problem of providing life-saving pharmaceuticals to the poor in developing countries
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,085
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Gerald F. Cavanagh (2004). Global Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (4):625-642.
Juha Räikkä (2006). Pogge on Global Poverty. Journal of Global Ethics 2 (1):111 – 118.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-17

Total downloads

13 ( #121,151 of 1,101,676 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #178,427 of 1,101,676 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.