Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):443-458 (2007)
|Abstract||: Establishing and defending the Christian faith serves as both a guide and a limit to Berkeley's intriguing metaphysics. I take Berkeley seriously when he says that his aim is to promote the consideration of God and the truth of Christianity. In this paper I discuss and engage Berkeley's superficially weak argument (which I call the natural analogy argument) in defense of the plausibility of the doctrine of bodily resurrection. When his immaterialist resources are properly applied, the argument has more merit than one might initially believe. I conclude by speculating that Berkeley had reason to believe that immaterialism was a better fit with Christianity than materialism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joanna K. Forstrom (2010). John Locke and Personal Identity: Immortality and Bodily Resurrection in 17th-Century Philosophy. Continuum.
A. C. Grayling (2005). Berkeley's Argument for Immaterialism. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press.
Georges Dicker (2011). Berkeley's Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford University Press.
George Botterill (2007). God and First Person in Berkeley. Philosophy 82 (1):87-114.
David Berman (2005). Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. Thoemmes Continuum.
Walter R. Ott (2004). The Cartesian Context of Berkeley's Attack on Abstraction. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
Daniele Bertini (2007). Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley's Master Argument. Idealistic Studies 37 (1):43-50.
James S. Spiegel (1996). The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley's Immaterialism. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):216-235.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #40,051 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?