David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 16 (3):251-264 (1994)
Racial environmental inequities, documented in research over the past ten years, have deep cultural sources in the connections between the concept of social pollution as it has operated in U.S. race relations and the pollution of minority communities, both of which are, in part, the expression of our dominant cultural ethic and project of mastering nature. The project of mastering nature requires thedisciplining of “human nature” in a context of social power in order to dominate “outward” or “external” nature for the purposes of production and consumption. In disciplining human nature, our ethics and practices of work and gender have fostered the repression and projection of sensuality, widely construed, onto African-Americans in particular. This racial “other” has been historically segregated in our society through social pollution taboos. Social pollution practices, in turn, facilitate the disproportionate environmental pollution of minority communities by rendering such pollution, like the communities themselves, less visible and therefore less of a threat to white centers of power. This fit between social and environmental pollution is expressed in the notion of “appropriately polluted space.” Attempts to understand and correct racial environmental inequities will founder unless these deeper cultural connections are recognized and challenged. Moreover, attempts to redefine an environmentally benign “self” in the Americancontext require that the historical “other” of race be confronted and transcended
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard T. Twine (2001). Ma(R)King Essence-Ecofeminism and Embodiment. Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):31-58.
Richard T. Twine (2001). Making Essence-Ecofeminism and Embodiment. Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):31-58.
Similar books and articles
Bishal Kishor Atreya, Fred K. Sitaula, Roshan H. Johnsen & M. Bajracharya (forthcoming). Continuing Issues in the Limitations of Pesticide Use in Developing Countries. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Ömer Naci Soykan (2007). Looking at the World From Istanbul as a Metaphor. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:191-195.
Paul Steidlmeier (1993). The Morality of Pollution Permits. Environmental Ethics 15 (2):133-150.
Andrew Kernohan (1995). Rights Against Polluters. Environmental Ethics 17 (3):245-257.
Robert S. Dooley & Gerald E. Fryxell (1999). Are Conglomerates Less Environmentally Responsible? An Empirical Examination of Diversification Strategy and Subsidiary Pollution in the U.S. Chemical Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 21 (1):1 - 14.
Donald C. Lee (1980). On the Marxian View of the Relationship Between Man and Nature. Environmental Ethics 2 (1):3-16.
Kevin Christopher Elliott (2010). Is a Little Pollution Good for You?: Incorporating Societal Values in Environmental Research. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #300,248 of 1,911,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #320,814 of 1,911,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?