Self‐interest and responsive regulation

Critical Review 7 (2-3):181-192 (1993)
To make regulation more responsive to the public interest, Ian Ayers and John Braithwaite recommend improved administrative techniques, such as enforcement pyramids, to improve industry compliance; and they advocate vesting public interest groups with regulatory powers, so as to reduce regulatory capture by industry. Their arguments, while suggestive, do not take seriously enough the subtle and multifarious influences of interest groups. Consequently, the authors? recommendations are not likely to improve regulation's responsiveness to the general welfare.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913819308443294
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,890
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Lawrence J. Lad (2005). Paradoxes of Industry Self-Regulation. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:259-262.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

2 ( #533,844 of 1,725,404 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,420 of 1,725,404 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.