David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Ethics 1 (2):105 - 140 (1997)
Rejecting Kant''s absolute opposition to revolution, I propose a modified Kantian perspective for reflecting on political violence, drawing from Kant''s basic ideas but abandoning some dubious assumptions. Developing suggestions in earlier papers, the essay sketches a model for moral legislation that combines the core ideas of each of Kant''s formulas of the Categorical Imperative. Though only a framework for deliberation, not a complete decision procedure, this excludes extremist positions, prohibitive and permissive, about political violence. Despite Kant''s hopes, the values implicit in his fundamental principle fail to support easy, inflexible solutions; but they place strong presumptions against lawless coercion and killing, undermining social order, treating persons as dispensable, underestimating options, arrogant faith in one''s own judgment, and reckless simplicity in political thinking.
|Keywords||categorical imperative ends in themselves justice Kant Kantian kingdom of ends political resistance revolution violence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Radu Neculau (2008). Does Kant's Rejection of the Right to Resist Make Him a Legal Rigorist? Instantiation and Interpretation in the Rechtslehre. Kantian Review 13 (2):107-140.
Similar books and articles
Robert L. Holmes (2001). A Western Perspective on the Problem of Violence. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:193-205.
Jacqui Poltera (2011). Violence and Silencing: A Philosophical Investigation of Apartheid. Critical Horizons 12 (2):232-250.
Ted Honderich (1980). Violence for Equality: Inquiries in Political Philosophy: Incorporating Three Essays on Political Violence. Penguin.
Avery Goldman (2010). An Antinomy of Political Judgment: Kant, Arendt, and the Role of Purposiveness in Reflective Judgment. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):331-352.
Cécile Lavergne (2011). Questioning the Moral Justification of Political Violence: Recognition Conflicts, Identities and Emancipation. Critical Horizons 12 (2):211-231.
Virginia Held (1997). The Media and Political Violence. Journal of Ethics 1 (2):187-202.
Johanna Oksala (2012). Foucault, Politics, and Violence. Northwestern University Press.
Thomas E. Hill (2000). Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #90,583 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #317,270 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?