David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 73 (5):765-77 (2006)
We consider the question of the manner of the internalization of the geometry and topology of physical space in the mind, both the mechanism of internalization and precisely what structures are internalized. Though we will not argue for the point here, we agree with the long tradition which holds that an understanding of this issue is crucial for addressing many metaphysical and epistemological questions concerning space.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jairo José Silva (2012). Husserl on Geometry and Spatial Representation. Axiomathes 22 (1):5-30.
Michael Kubovy & William Epstein (2001). Internalization: A Metaphor We Can Live Without. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):618-625.
Horst Krist (2001). The Internalization of Physical Constraints From a Developmental Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):681-682.
Nick Huggett (2003). Mirror Symmetry: What is It for Relational Space to Be Orientable? In Katherine Brading & Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press. 281.
Tim Maudlin (2010). Time, Topology and Physical Geometry. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):63-78.
Nestor G. Martinez (1996). A Simplified Duality for Implicative Lattices and L-Groups. Studia Logica 56 (1-2):185 - 204.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #42,646 of 1,696,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #92,252 of 1,696,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?