Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives
Graduate studies at Western
Clarendon Press (2002)
|Abstract||Thomas Hill, a leading figure in the recent development of Kantian moral philosophy, presents a series of essays that interpret and develop Kant's ideas on ethics. The first part of the book focuses on basic concepts: a priori method, a good will, categorical imperatives, autonomy, and constructivist strategies of argument. Hill goes on to consider aspects of human welfare, and then moral worth--the nature and grounds of moral assessment of persons as deserving esteem or blame. He offers illuminating discussions of happiness, beneficence, personal values, conscience, moral desert, moral dilemmas, and feelings of regret. He is critical of Kant at many points, but he shows how many familiar objections miss the mark. Two previously unpublished essays challenge the views of other influential Kant scholars and defend alternative interpretations of Kant on beneficence, supererogation, and what it means to 'set oneself an end'. These clear and careful writings show moral, poltical, and social philosophers just how valuable Kantian ethical theory can be in addressing practical matters.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas E. Hill (2002). Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Samuel J. Kerstein (2004). Thomas E. Hill, Jr., Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives:Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Ethics 114 (2):350-353.
Robert Hanna (2006). Book Review: Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):237-240.
Jill Hernandez (2010). Impermissibility and Kantian Moral Worth. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):403 - 419.
Christopher Martin (2011). Education Without Moral Worth? Kantian Moral Theory and the Obligation to Educate Others. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):475-492.
Marilea Bramer (2010). The Importance of Personal Relationships in Kantian Moral Theory: A Reply to Care Ethics. Hypatia 25 (1):121-139.
Alison Hills (2008). Kantian Value Realism. Ratio 21 (2):182–200.
Thomas E. Hill (2000). Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Emer O'Hagan (2009). Moral Self-Knowledge in Kantian Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):525-537.
J. B. Schneewind (2010). Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Kate A. Moran (2012). Community and Progress in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Catholic University of America Press.
Barbara Herman (1981). On the Value of Acting From the Motive of Duty. Philosophical Review 90 (3):359-382.
Bernd Ludwig (2007). Kant, Garve, and the Motives of Moral Action. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):183-193.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?