On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs

Abstract
This paper is a commentary on some topics discussed by Thomas Short in his recent book Peirce's Theory of Signs: Peirce's distinction between iconic and indexical signs, the objects of propositions, and different ways of interpreting the distinction between the immediate and dynamic objects of signs. Peirce's distinction between immediate and dynamic objects is in certain respects analogous to Alexius Meinong's distinction between the "auxiliary objects" and the "ultimate objects" ("target objects") of mental representations. It is suggested that the models of a theory can be regarded as its immediate objects, and the real systems represented by the models are the dynamic objects of the theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,768
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
T. L. Short (2007). Respones. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):663 - 693.
T. L. Short (2007). Response. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Christopher Hookway (2007). Short on Peirce's Early Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):619 - 625.
James Jakób Liszka (2007). Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T. L. Short's. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Carl R. Hausman (2007). Metaphorical Semeiotic Referents: Dyadic Objects. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):276-287.
Albert Atkin (2008). Peirce's Final Account of Signs and the Philosophy of Language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 63-85.
Andrew Garnar (2006). Power, Action, Signs: Between Peirce and Foucault. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):347-366.
Hermann Deuser & Dennis Beach (1993). Christianity—Sign Among Signs? Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (4):286 - 297.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

11 ( #135,321 of 1,098,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #175,054 of 1,098,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.