Paradise proclaimed? Towards a theoretical understanding of representations of nature in land use planning decision-making
Philosophy and Geography 1 (1):77 – 91 (1998)
|Abstract||Land use planning, based in either traditional liberalist philosophy or the emerging pragmatist philosophy formalizes an anthropocentric, reductionist division within itself: between nature (land) and society (use), ignoring the socially constructed character of both terms. Representations of nature become political issues mediated through the planning system, with the various actants and their networks attempting to exert power over others in order to influence the outcome. Based on a theoretical understanding of, by deconstructing the different representations of nature/the environment and identifying the discourses and narratives invoked by participants in land use planning decisions, we can better understand how nature continues to be exploited by humans in their own interests.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette (1988). Agriculture, Ethics, and Restrictions on Property Rights. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):21-40.
John L. Pollock, Against Optimality: Logical Foundations for Decision-Theoretic Planning in Autonomous Agents.
Emily Brady (2007). Aesthetic Regard for Nature in Environmental and Land Art. Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):287 – 300.
Sheila Lintott (2007). Ethically Evaluating Land Art: Is It Worth It? Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):263 – 277.
Eugene C. Hargrove (1980). Anglo-American Land Use Attitudes. Environmental Ethics 2 (2):121-148.
Roman Briggs (2009). The Greening of Heart and Mind: A Love Story. Environmental Ethics 31 (2):155-168.
Jean Hillier (1999). What Values? Whose Values? Philosophy and Geography 2 (2):179 – 199.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads10 ( #106,175 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?