Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 166 (1):33-43 (2013)
|Abstract||Fred Dretske, Michael Tooley, and David Armstrong accept a theory of governing laws of nature according to which laws are atomic states of affairs that necessitate corresponding natural regularities. Some philosophers object to the Dretske/Tooley/Armstrong theory on the grounds that there is no illuminating account of the necessary connection between governing law and natural regularity. In response, Michael Tooley has provided a reductive account of this necessary connection in his book Causation (1987). In this essay, I discuss an improved version of his account and argue that it fails. First, the account cannot be extended to explain the necessary connection between certain sorts of laws—namely, probabilistic laws and laws relating structural universals—and their corresponding regularities. Second, Tooley’s account succeeds only by (very subtly) incorporating primitive necessity elsewhere, so the problem of avoiding primitive necessity is merely relocated|
|Keywords||Metaphysics Laws of nature Humeanism Inference problem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Quentin Smith (1996). The Metaphysical Necessity of Natural Laws. Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society 18:104-23.
Richard Swinburne (2004). The Argument From Laws of Nature Reassessed. In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Tyler Hildebrand (forthcoming). Can Bare Dispositions Explain Categorical Regularities? Philosophical Studies.
Theodore Sider (1992). Tooley's Solution to the Inference Problem. Philosophical Studies 67 (3):261 - 275.
Joan Pag (2002). The Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227 – 243.
Joan Page`S. (2002). The Dretske–Tooley–Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227-243.
Peter Vallentyne (1988). Explicating Lawhood. Philosophy of Science 55 (4):598-613.
Z. Yudell (2013). Lange's Challenge: Accounting for Meta-Laws. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):347-369.
James Woodward (1992). Realism About Laws. Erkenntnis 36 (2):181-218.
Holly Andersen (2011). Mechanisms, Laws, and Regularities. Philosophy of Science 78 (2):325-331.
D. H. Mellor (1990). Laws, Chances and Properties. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):159 – 170.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2012). Law. In George Kurian (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Christian Civilisation. Blackwell.
Norman Swartz, Laws of Nature. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Duncan Maclean (2012). Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):1-13.
Added to index2012-09-02
Total downloads119 ( #5,536 of 739,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)68 ( #619 of 739,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?