Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- David R. Hiley (1980). The Disappearance Theory and the Denotation Argument. Philosophical Studies 37 (April):307-20.
Similar books and articles
This paper discusses certain problems arising within the treatment of the senses of functions in Alonzo Church's Logic of Sense and Denotation. Church understands such senses themselves to be "sense-functions," functions from sense to sense. However, the conditions he lays out under which a sense-function is to be regarded as a sense presenting another function as denotation allow for certain undesirable results given certain unusual or "deviant" sense-functions. Certain absurdities result, e.g., an argument can be found for equating any two senses of the same type. An alternative treatment of the senses of functions is discussed, and is thought to do better justice to Frege's original theory.
No categories
The paper enriches the conceptual apparatus of the theory of meaning and denotation that was presented in Part I (Section 3). This part concentrates on the notion of interpretation, which is defined as an equivalence class of the relation possessing the same manner of interpreting types. In this part, some relations between meaning and interpretation, as well as one between denotation an interpretational denotation are established. In the theory of meaning and interpretation, the notion of language communication has been formally introduced and some conditions of correctness of communication have been formulated.
An expanded and updated edition of this classic collection.
Discussion of David R. Hiley, The disappearance theory and the denotation argument
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

