British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):183-192 (1988)
|Abstract||The traditional absolutist-relationist controversy about space and time conflates four distinct issues: existence, abstraction, relationality and relativity. Terms which are relational, relative or abstract may denote items which possess contingent properties. Possession of such properties, including topological and geometrical properties, is therefore no indication of logical type. To fail to recognise the possibility of spaces, times and space-times of various logical types is to risk conflating two distinct ontological issues: a metaphysical issue concerning the existence of abstract objects and a question of physics concerning the existence of causally efficacious sub-strata which may or may not be needed to explain the contingent properties of the abstract objects. * Thanks are due to an anonymous fereree whose comments enabled me to improve an earlier version of this essay.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. Dieks (2001). Space and Time in Particle and Field Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (2):217-241.
Yuri Balashov (2000). Persistence and Space-Time. The Monist 83 (3):321-340.
John Hawthorne & Theodore Sider (2002). Locations. Philosophical Topics 30 (1):53-76.
Robert Rynasiewicz, Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
M. J. Cresswell (2010). Abstract Entities in the Causal Order. Theoria 76 (3):249-265.
Ned Markosian (1992). On Language and the Passage of Time. Philosophical Studies 66 (1):1 - 26.
Timothy Crockett (2008). Space and Time in Leibniz's Early Metaphysics. The Leibniz Review 18:41-79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #79,731 of 556,908 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,908 )
How can I increase my downloads?