Semantical games, the alleged ambiguity of 'is', and aristotelian categories
Synthese 54 (3):443 - 468 (1983)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMatt McCormick (2001). Is It Wrong to Play Violent Video Games? Ethics and Information Technology 3 (4):277–287.
Michael Hand (1989). Who Plays Semantical Games? Philosophical Studies 56 (3):251 - 271.
Ebbe Groes, Hans Jørgen Jacobsen, Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranaes (1998). Nash Equilibrium with Lower Probabilities. Theory and Decision 44 (1):37-66.
K. Jaakko J. Hintikka (1959). Aristotle and the Ambiguity of Ambiguity. Inquiry 2 (1-4):137 – 151.
Johan Van Benthem (2003). Logic Games Are Complete for Game Logics. Studia Logica 75 (2):183 - 203.
Johan van Benthem (2003). Logic Games Are Complete for Game Logics. Studia Logica 75 (2).
Arcady Blinov (1994). Semantic Games with Chance Moves. Synthese 99 (3):311 - 327.
Michael Hand (1988). How Game-Theoretical Semantics Works: Classical First-Order Logic. Erkenntnis 29 (1):77 - 93.
Jaakko Hintikka (1982). Temporal Discourse and Semantical Games. Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (1):3 - 22.
Jaakko Hintikka (1979). "Is", Semantical Games, and Semantical Relativity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):433 - 468.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #79,694 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
