Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 70 (1):89-104 (2003)
|Abstract||The following analysis shows how developments in epistemic logic can play a nontrivial role in cognitive neuroscience. We argue that the striking correspondence between two modes of identification, as distinguished in the epistemic context, and two cognitive systems distinguished by neuroscientific investigation of the visual system (the "where" and "what" systems) is not coincidental, and that it can play a clarificatory role at the most fundamental levels of neuroscientific theory|
|Keywords||Epistemic Logic Identification Neuroscience Science Vision|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wolfgang Lenzen (1979). Epistemologische Betrachtungen Zu [S4, S5]. Erkenntnis 14 (1):33 - 56.
Martha J. Farah (2000). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision. Blackwell Publishers.
Vincent F. Hendricks & John Symons (2006). Where's the Bridge? Epistemology and Epistemic Logic. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):137 - 167.
Jaakko Hintikka (1990). The Cartesian Cogito, Epistemic Logic and Neuroscience: Some Surprising Interrelations. Synthese 83 (1):133 - 157.
John Symons (2006). Where's the Bridge? Epistemology and Epistemic Logic. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):137 - 167.
Cédric Dégremont & Nina Gierasimczuk (2011). Finite Identification From the Viewpoint of Epistemic Update. Information And Computation 209 (3):383-396.
Nina Gierasimczuk (2009). Bridging Learning Theory and Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese 169 (2):371-384.
Elisabeth Pacherie (1995). Do We See with Microscopes? The Monist 78 (2):171-188.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #20,840 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,222 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?