The case for ad hominem arguments
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (4):338 – 345 (1982)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Makin (1999). Aristotle's Two Modal Theses Again. Phronesis 44 (2):114-126.
Graciela Marta Chichi (2002). The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument. Argumentation 16 (3):333-348.
Douglas N. Walton (2000). Case Study of the Use of a Circumstantial Ad Hominem in Political Argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 33 (2):101-115.
C. Swoyer (2001). The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument; Ad Hominem Arguments. Philosophical Review 110 (2):291-295.
John Woods (2001). Walton, Douglas (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments. Argumentation 15 (4):503-507.
D. N. Walton (2004). Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument. Argumentation 18 (3):359-368.
Gary James Jason (1984). Is There a Case for Ad Hominem Arguments? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (2):182 – 185.
Moti Mizrahi (2010). Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority. Informal Logic 30 (4):435-456.
Peter Suber (1990). A Case Study in 'Ad Hominem' Arguments: Fichte's "Science of Knowledge". Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (1):12 - 42.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,117 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
