David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 183 (1):69-85 (2011)
The modern notion of the axiomatic method developed as a part of the conceptualization of mathematics starting in the nineteenth century. The basic idea of the method is the capture of a class of structures as the models of an axiomatic system. The mathematical study of such classes of structures is not exhausted by the derivation of theorems from the axioms but includes normally the metatheory of the axiom system. This conception of axiomatization satisfies the crucial requirement that the derivation of theorems from axioms does not produce new information in the usual sense of the term called depth information. It can produce new information in a different sense of information called surface information. It is argued in this paper that the derivation should be based on a model-theoretical relation of logical consequence rather than derivability by means of mechanical (recursive) rules. Likewise completeness must be understood by reference to a model-theoretical consequence relation. A correctly understood notion of axiomatization does not apply to purely logical theories. In the latter the only relevant kind of axiomatization amounts to recursive enumeration of logical truths. First-order “axiomatic” set theories are not genuine axiomatizations. The main reason is that their models are structures of particulars, not of sets. Axiomatization cannot usually be motivated epistemologically, but it is related to the idea of explanation
|Keywords||Axiomatic method Information Logical consequence Completeness Set theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mathias Frisch (2005). Inconsistency, Asymmetry, and Non-Locality: A Philosophical Investigation of Classical Electrodynamics. Oxford University Press.
Jaakko Hintikka (2007). Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning. Cambridge University Press.
Jaakko Hintikka (1996). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Alfred Tarski (1936). Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den Formalisierten Sprachen. Studia Philosophica 1:261--405.
K. Gödel (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik 38 (1):173--198.
Citations of this work BETA
Günther Eder (2016). Frege’s ‘On the Foundations of Geometry’ and Axiomatic Metatheory. Mind 125 (497):5-40.
Similar books and articles
Marc Pauly (2008). On the Role of Language in Social Choice Theory. Synthese 163 (2):227 - 243.
Ivahn Smadja (2012). Local Axioms in Disguise: Hilbert on Minkowski Diagrams. Synthese 186 (1):315-370.
Volker Peckhaus (1995). Hilberts Logik. Von der Axiomatik zur Beweistheorie. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 3 (1):65-86.
Marcel Boumans (2012). Measurement in Economics. In Uskali Mäki, Dov M. Gabbay, Paul Thagard & John Woods (eds.), Philosophy of Economics. North Holland 395.
Ignacio Jane (1997). Theoremhood and Logical Consequence. Theoria 12 (1):139-160.
Ryan Christensen (2011). Theories and Theories of Truth. Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.
Michael Stöltzner (2002). How Metaphysical is “Deepening the Foundations”?: Hahn and Frank on Hilbert’s Axiomatic Method. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:245-262.
Added to index2009-10-12
Total downloads205 ( #17,041 of 1,940,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #27,518 of 1,940,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?