Objectivity Without Objects

We can describe languages in which no words refer to objects. Such languages may contain sentences equivalent to any sentences of English, and hence may allow for as much objectivity as English does. It is wrong to try to deal with such languages by claiming that there are more objects than those accepted by common sense ontology. The correct move is rather to acknowledge a sense in which the concept of an object might have been different. A consequence of this position is that we cannot have a general semantics applicable to every describable language in which words are referentially connected to objects. The point here is not that reference may be inscrutable, but that different concepts of ‘referring to an object’ may be required for different languages
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/wcp20200052
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,658
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
E. Montuschi (2004). Rethinking Objectivity in Social Science. Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):109 – 122.
Alva Noë (2011). Doświadczanie świata w czasie. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 2 (1):59 - 65.
Ingeborg Strohmeyer (1987). Tragweite Und Grenze der Transzendentalphilosophie Zur Grundlegung der Quantenphysik. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 18 (1-2):239-275.
Ned Markosian (2000). What Are Physical Objects? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.
Alberto Voltolini (1994). Ficta Versus Possibilia. Grazer Philosophische Studien 48:75-104.
Kristie Miller (2008). Thing and Object. Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

25 ( #119,995 of 1,725,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #109,857 of 1,725,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.