Graduate studies at Western
Consciousness and Cognition 20:151-176 (2011)
|Abstract||When laws or legal principles mention mental states such as intentions to form a contract, knowledge of risk, or purposely causing a death, what parts of the brain are they speaking about? We argue here that these principles are tacitly directed at our prefrontal executive processes. Our current best theories of consciousness portray it as a workspace in which executive processes operate, but what is important to the law is what is done with the workspace content rather than the content itself. This makes executive processes more important to the law than consciousness, since they are responsible for channeling conscious decision-making into intentions and actions, or inhibiting action.We provide a summary of the current state of our knowledge about executive processes, which consists primarily of information about which portions of the prefrontal lobes perform which executive processes. Then we describe several examples in which legal principles can be understood as tacitly singling out executive processes, including principles regarding defendants’ intentions or plans to commit crimes and their awareness that certain facts are the case(for instance, that a gun is loaded), as well as excusatory principles which result in lesser responsibility for those who are juveniles, mentally ill, sleepwalking, hypnotized, or who suffer from psychopathy.|
|Keywords||responsibility legal agency executive processes intention|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Suzanne Hala (2004). The Role of Executive Function in Constructing an Understanding of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):108-109.
Katrina L. Sifferd (2013). Translating Scientific Evidence Into the Language of the ‘Folk’: Executive Function as Capacity-Responsibility. In Nicole A. Vincent (ed.), Legal Responsibility and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Diego Fernandez-Duque, J. A. Baird & Michael I. Posner (2000). Executive Attention and Metacognitive Regulation. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):288-307.
S. Andrew Ostapski, John Oliver & Gaston T. Gonzalez (1996). The Legal and Ethical Components of Executive Decision-Making: A Course for Business Managers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):571 - 579.
Katrina Sifferd & William Hirstein (2012). On the Criminal Culpability of Successful and Unsucessful Psychopaths. Neuroethics 6 (1):129-140.
Jesús H. Aguilar & Andrei A. Buckareff (2009). Agency, Consciousness, and Executive Control. Philosophia 37 (1):21-30.
Dr Wayne Christensen (2006). The Evolutionary Origins of Volition. In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
Catherine Stinson (2009). Searching for the Source of Executive Attention. PSYCHE 15 (1):137-154.
Bill Faw (2000). My Amygdala-Orbitofrontal-Circuit Made Me Do It. Consciousness and Emotion 1 (1):167-179.
Kleio Akrivou, Dimitrios Bourantas, Shenjiang Mo & Evi Papalois (2011). The Sound of Silence – A Space for Morality? The Role of Solitude for Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1):119-133.
John Dobson (2011). A Moral and Economic Defense of Executive Compensation. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1-2):59-70.
Ella Mae Matsumura & Jae Yong Shin (2005). Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation: Intended and Unintended Consequences. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):101 - 113.
Martin Skladany (2009). The Executive as Executioner and the Informed Governance Principle. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):289-300.
Samuel M. Natale & Thomas Diamante (2005). The Five Stages of Executive Coaching: Better Process Makes Better Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):361 - 374.
Added to index2010-10-25
Total downloads27 ( #51,668 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?