Can a Computer Have a Religious Experience?
| Abstract | A religious experience is a phenomenological occurrence which is interpreted by the perceiver in such a way as to affirm or strengthen the belief in a higher being or the beliefs of a particular religion. Religion and, therefore, religious experiences are primarily mental constructs. Computational theory of mind provides the strongest capabilities of applying mental activities to computers. However, cognitive science and philosophy needs to establish the link between beliefs and physical states in order for computational theory of mind to be truly effective. There is also an issue with the semantic concepts associated with religion and religious experience. The problem of semantics has plagued computational theory of mind for years, and the issue has yet to be truly resolved. Computational theory of mind does, however, have the power to establish the causal link between the mental activities and the physical manifestations of a religious experience. I conclude that there is not strong enough evidence to currently support the hypothesis that a computer could have a genuine religious experience. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Philosophy of Mind Computational Theory of Mind Philosophy of Religion | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesKeith E. Yandell (1993). The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cambridge University.
John Hick (2007). The New Frontier of Religion and Science: Religious Experience, Neuroscience, and the Transcendent. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bartlomiej Swiatczak (2011). Conscious Representations: An Intractable Problem for the Computational Theory of Mind. Minds and Machines 21 (1):19-32.
Steven Horst, The Computational Theory of Mind. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Tomer Fekete & Shimon Edelman (2011). Towards a Computational Theory of Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):807-827.
Douglas Clyde Macintosh & Eugene Garrett Bewkes (eds.) (1971). The Nature of Religious Experience. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
William James (2004). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Simon & Schuster.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2007). Computational Explanation and Mechanistic Explanation of Mind. In Francesco Ferretti, Massimo Marraffa & Mario De Caro (eds.), Cartographies of the Mind: The Interface Between Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Springer.
Joseph Runzo, Craig K. Ihara & Alvin Plantinga (eds.) (1986). Religious Experience and Religious Belief: Essays in the Epistemology of Religion. University Press of America.
D. Z. Phillips (2000). Recovering Religious Concepts: Closing Epistemic Divides. St. Martin's Press.
Eugene Garrett Bewkes, Julius Seelye Bixler & Douglas Clyde Macintosh (eds.) (1937). The Nature of Religious Experience. London, Harper & Brothers.
Gerard O'Brien & Jonathan Opie (1997). Cognitive Science and Phenomenal Consciousness: A Dilemma, and How to Avoid It. Philosophical Psychology 10 (3):269-86.
Rainer Reisenzein (2009). Emotional Experience in the Computational Belief-Desire Theory of Emotion. Emotion Review 1:214-222.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2006). Computational Explanation in Neuroscience. Synthese 153 (3):343-353.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-11-04Total downloads8 ( #122,991 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,082 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
