Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):111-118 (1995)
|Abstract||I vindicate Hume’s argument against belief in miracle reports against a prevalent objection. Hume has us balance the probability of a miracle’s occurrence against the probability of its being falsely attested to, and argues that the latter must inevitably be the greater; thus, reason requires us to reject any miracle report. The "flaw" in this reasoning, according to Butler and many others, is that it proves too much--it counsels us to never believe historians, newspaper reports of lottery results, and so on; and this is clearly absurd. I show that this objection is misguided: far from providing counterexamples to Hume’s "balancing principle", as I call it, these cases actually confirm it, as some simple calculations of probabilities show|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alan Hájek (2008). Are Miracles Chimerical? In Alan Hájek (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume 1. Oxford Univ Pr.
Chris Slupik (1995). A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'. Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
James E. Taylor (2007). Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism. Philosophy Compass 2 (4):611–624.
Francis J. Beckwith (1991). Hume's Evidential/Testimonial Epistemology, Probability, and Miracles. Logos 12:87 - 104.
Ruth Weintraub (1996). The Credibility of Miracles. Philosophical Studies 82 (3):359 - 375.
Matthew C. Bagger (1997). Hume and Miracles. Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (2):237 - 251.
Robert J. Fogelin (2003). A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Princeton Univ Pr.
Richard Otte (1996). Mackie's Treatment of Miracles. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151 - 158.
Hendrik Van der Breggen (2002). Hume's Scale: How Hume Counts a Miracle's Improbability Twice. Philosophia Christi 4 (2):443 - 453.
Dorothy P. Coleman (1988). Hume, Miracles and Lotteries. Hume Studies 14 (2):328-346.
Michael Levine (1997). Bayesian Analyses of Hume's Argument Concerning Miracles. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):101-106.
William L. Vanderburgh (2005). Of Miracles and Evidential Probability. Hume Studies 31 (1):37-61.
John M. DePoe (2008). Vindicating a Bayesian Approach to Confirming Miracles: A Response to Jordan Howard Sobel's Reading of Hume. Philosophia Christi 10 (1):229 - 238.
Bruce Langtry (1990). Hume, Probability, Lotteries and Miracles. Hume Studies 16 (1):67-74.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads5 ( #169,941 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,982 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?