Who needs bioethicists?

Recent years have seen the emergence of a new brand of moral philosopher. Straddling the gap between academia on the one hand, and the world of law, medicine, and politics on the other, bioethicists have appeared, offering advice on ethical issues to a wider public than the philosophy classroom. Some bioethicists, like Peter Singer, have achieved wide notoriety in the public realm with provocative arguments that challenge widely held beliefs about the relative moral status of animals, human foetuses and newborn babies. Other bioethicists practice their trade with greater protection from public scrutiny, confining their thoughts to committees in government circles, universities, charitable institutions, or hospitals. But what exactly is it that bioethicists have to offer in such contexts? What sort of expertise do bioethicists have that justifies their employment on these committees, or the time and space accorded to their views on television and the radio, or in newspapers and magazines? In spite of being an expanding group of professionals who attract large sums of private and public funding, bioethicists are sometimes met with suspicion or even hostility, both inside and outside academia. One common criticism is that the presence of bioethicists is unproductive in practical bioethical debate. In light of this criticism one might wonder why the relevant funding bodies have not spotted the hoax and withdrawn their funding. Certainly, if bioethicists..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2003.12.009
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Hallvard Lillehammer, Who needs bioethicists?
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Bernard Williams (1988). Consequentialism and Integrity. In Samuel Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and its Critics. Oxford University Press 20--50.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
James Lindemann Nelson (1999). Bioethics as Several Kinds of Writing. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (2):148 – 163.
Jason Scott Robert (2009). Toward a Better Bioethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):283-291.
Harold Braswell (2011). In Search of a Wide-Angle Lens. Hastings Center Report 41 (3):19-21.
Raymond de Vries (2011). The Uses and Abuses of Moral Theory in Bioethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):419-430.
Judith Andre, Leonard Fleck & Tom Tomlinson (1999). Improving Our Aim. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (2):130 – 147.
Susan Sherwin (2008). Whither Bioethics? How Feminism Can Help Reorient Bioethics. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (1):7 - 27.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

121 ( #30,993 of 1,796,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

34 ( #23,917 of 1,796,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.