A Global Analysis of Corporate Social Performance: The Effects of Cultural and Geographic Environments [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4):423-433 (2012)
|Abstract||As more and more multi-national companies expand their operations globally, their responsibilities extend beyond not only the economic motive of profitability but also other social and environmental factors. The objective of this article is to examine the impact of national culture and geographic environment on firms’ corporate social performance (CSP). Empirical tests are based on a global CSP database of companies from 49 countries. Results show that the Hofstede’s cultural dimensions are significantly associated with CSP. In addition, European companies are found to out-perform other regions and countries in CSP|
|Keywords||Corporate social performance Corporate social responsibility Cross-cultural comparison Hofstede cultural dimensions Cross regional comparison|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip L. Baird, Pinar Celikkol Geylani & Jeffrey A. Roberts (2012). Corporate Social and Financial Performance Re-Examined: Industry Effects in a Linear Mixed Model Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):367-388.
Yongqiang Gao (2009). Corporate Social Performance in China: Evidence From Large Companies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):23 - 35.
Frank J. de Graaf & Cor A. J. Herkströter (2007). How Corporate Social Performance is Institutionalised Within the Governance Structure. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2):177-189.
Frank J. De Graaf & Cor A. J. Herkströter (2007). How Corporate Social Performance Is Institutionalised Within the Governance Structure. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2):177 - 189.
Linda D. Lerner & Gerald E. Fryxell (1988). An Empirical Study of the Predictors of Corporate Social Performance: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (12):951 - 959.
Nikolay A. Dentchev (2004). Corporate Social Performance as a Business Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):397 - 412.
Steven L. Wartick & John F. Mahon (2009). Corporate Social Performance Profiling. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:326-336.
Jacques Igalens & Jean-Pascal Gond (2005). Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A Critical and Empirical Analysis of ARESE Data. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 56 (2):131 - 148.
Maria-Gaia Soana (2011). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance in the Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1):133-148.
Marcus Wagner (2010). Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: A Quantitative Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4):581 - 594.
Harry J. van Buren Iii (2005). An Employee-Centered Model of Corporate Social Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4):687-709.
Stephen Brammer, Stephen Pavelin & Lynda Porter (2005). Corporate Social Performance and Geographical Diversification. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:81-86.
Cyril Bouquet & Yuval Deutsch (2008). The Impact of Corporate Social Performance on a Firm's Multinationality. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):755 - 769.
Francesco Perrini, Angeloantonio Russo, Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro (2011). Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):59-76.
Rim Makni, Claude Francoeur & François Bellavance (2009). Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence From Canadian Firms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):409 - 422.
Added to index2011-10-12
Total downloads7 ( #142,818 of 755,261 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,366 of 755,261 )
How can I increase my downloads?