Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):414-415 (2003)
|Abstract||Lehar's revival of phenomenology and his all-encompassing Gestalt Bubble model are ambitious and stimulating. I offer an illustrated caution about phenomenology, a more fractured alternative to his Bubble model, and two lines of phenomena that may disqualify his isomorphism. I think a perceptual-inquiry model can contend.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brendan T. Johns & Michael N. Jones (2012). Perceptual Inference Through Global Lexical Similarity. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):103-120.
Charles R. Fox (2003). Empirical Constraints for Perceptual Modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):411-412.
Włodzisław Duch (2003). Just Bubbles? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):410-411.
Stephen Grossberg (2003). Linking Visual Cortex to Visual Perception: An Alternative to the Gestalt Bubble. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):412-413.
Jennifer Matey (2012). Representing the Impossible. Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Victor Rosenthal & Yves-Marie Visetti (2003). Gestalt Bubble and the Genesis of Space. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):424-424.
Birgitta Dresp (2003). Double, Double, Toil and Trouble – Fire Burn, and Theory Bubble! Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):409-410.
Steven Lehar (2003). Gestalt Isomorphism and the Primacy of Subjective Conscious Experience: A Gestalt Bubble Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):357-408.
Slobodan Markovic (2003). The Soap Bubble: Phenomenal State or Perceptual System Dynamics? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):420-421.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #180,507 of 556,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?