Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan's Question? Aquinas's Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288 (2003)
Cajetan’s analogy theory is usually evaluated in terms of its fidelity to the teachings of Aquinas. But what if Cajetan was trying to answer questions Aquinashimself did not raise, and so could not help to answer? Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia can be interpreted as intending to solve a particular semantic problem: to characterize the unity of the analogical concept, so as to defend the possibility of a non-univocal term’s mediating syllogistic reasoning. Aquinas offers various semantic characterizations of analogy, saying it involves, for instance: signification per prius et posterius; or a ratio propria which is only found in one analogate; or diverse modi significandi with a common res significata. Examined in turn, it is clear that none of Aquinas’s rules for analogy solve the semantic problem described. Cajetan thus cannot be reasonably expected to have intended his analogy treatise primarily as an interpretation or systematization of Aquinas’s teaching on analogy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joshua P. Hochschild (2010). The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. University of Notre Dame Press.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2005). The Rest of Cajetan's Analogy Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2003). Analogy, Semantics, and Hermeneutics: The “Concept Versus Judgment” Critique of Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (02):241-260.
Luca Gili (2012). A Renaissance Reading of Aquinas: Thomas Cajetan on the Ontological Status of Essences. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 13 (2):217-227.
Jennifer Hart Weed (2011). The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's de Nominum Analogia (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):121-122.
Antonio Donato (2003). The Role of Focus in Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301.
Petr Dvořák (2006). Some Thomists on Analogy. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):28-36.
E. Jennifer Ashworth (2010). Review of Joshua P. Hochschild, The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
Gyula Klima, Ens Multipliciter Dicitur: The Semantics and Metaphysics of Being in St. Thomas Aquinas.
Joseph P. Li Vecchi (2010). Analogical Deduction Via a Calculus of Predicables. Philo 13 (1):53-66.
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
Steven A. Long (2011). Analogia Entis: On the Analogy of Being, Metaphysics, and the Act of Faith. University of Notre Dame Press.
Victor Salas (2009). The Twofold Character of Thomas Aquinas's Analogy of Being. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):295-315.
John P. O'Callaghan (2002). Aquinas, Cognitive Theory, and Analogy. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):451-482.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads5 ( #255,934 of 1,410,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?