Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):986-986 (2001)
|Abstract||The theoretical proposal that perceptual experience be thought of as expectancies about sensorimotor contingencies, rather than as expressions of mental representations, is endorsed; examples that effectively enforce that view are discussed; and one example (of perceptual coupling) that seems to demand a mental representation, with all of the diagnostic value such a tool would have, is raised for consideration.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tom Roberts (2010). Understanding 'Sensorimotor Understanding'. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (1).
Gwendolyn E. Roberson, Mark T. Wallace & James A. Schirillo (2001). The Sensorimotor Contingency of Multisensory Localization Correlates with the Conscious Percept of Spatial Unity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1001-1002.
Bruce Bridgeman (2004). Violations of Sensorimotor Theories of Visual Experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):904-905.
Nigel J. T. Thomas, Mental Imagery. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Zenon W. Pylyshyn (2001). Seeing, Acting, and Knowing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):999-999.
Andy Clark (2006). Vision as Dance? Three Challenges for Sensorimotor Contingency Theory. Psyche 12 (1).
Donald Laming (2001). On the Distinction Between “Sensorimotor” and “Motorsensory” Contingencies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):992-992.
Evan Thompson (2005). Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (4):407-427.
Ned Block (2002). Behaviorism Revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):977-978.
Ernst Niebur (2001). Sensorimotor Contingencies Do Not Replace Internal Representations, and Mastery is Not Necessary for Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):994-995.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #106,175 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?