Nominalism, platonism and "being true of"
Noûs 1 (4):413-419 (1967)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. M. Dieterle (2000). Supervenience and Necessity: A Response to Balaguer. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):302-309.
Philip Goff (2008). A Non-Eliminative Understanding of Austere Nominalism. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):43–54.
Greg Restall (2003). Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Susan Haack (1978). Platonism Versus Nominalism. The Monist 61 (3):483-494.
Herbert Hochberg (1978). Nominalism, General Terms, and Predication. The Monist 61 (3):460-475.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,300 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
