International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356 (2005)
|Abstract||The influence of Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia is due largely to its first three chapters, which introduce Cajetan’s three modes of analogy: analogy of inequality, analogy of attribution, and analogy of proportionality. Interpreters typically ignore the final eight chapters, which describe further features of analogy of proportionality. This article explains this neglect as a symptom of a failure to appreciate Cajetan’s particular semantic concerns, taken independently from the question of systematizing the thought of Aquinas. After an exegesis of the neglected chapters, which describe the semantics of analogy through the three levels of cognition (simple apprehension, composition and division, and discursive reasoning), the article concludes with observations about the relationship between Cajetan and Aquinas and the philosophical and historical signifi cance of Cajetan’s approach to the semantics of analogy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joshua P. Hochschild (2010). The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. University of Notre Dame Press.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2003). Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan's Question? Aquinas's Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2003). Analogy, Semantics, and Hermeneutics: The “Concept Versus Judgment” Critique of Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (02).
E. Jennifer Ashworth (2010). Review of Joshua P. Hochschild, The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
Jennifer Hart Weed (2011). The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's de Nominum Analogia (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):121-122.
Petr Dvořák (2006). Some Thomists on Analogy. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):28-36.
Michael McCanles (1968). Univocalism in Cajetan's Doctrine of Analogy. The New Scholasticism 42 (1):18-47.
Joseph P. Li Vecchi (2010). Analogical Deduction Via a Calculus of Predicables. Philo 13 (1):53-66.
Steven A. Long (2011). Analogia Entis: On the Analogy of Being, Metaphysics, and the Act of Faith. University of Notre Dame Press.
Luca Gili (2012). A Renaissance Reading of Aquinas: Thomas Cajetan on the Ontological Status of Essences. Metaphysica 13 (2):217-227.
Victor Salas (2009). The Twofold Character of Thomas Aquinas's Analogy of Being. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):295-315.
Antonio Donato (2003). The Role of Focus in Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301.
Herbert Thomas Schwartz (1954). Analogy in St. Thomas and Cajetan. The New Scholasticism 28 (2):127-144.
Jiri Syrovatka (2000). Analogy and Understanding. Theoria 15 (3):435-450.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #178,586 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?