David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):387-405 (2003)
We provide a canonical construction of conformal covers for finite hypergraphs and present two immediate applications to the finite model theory of relational structures. In the setting of relational structures, conformal covers serve to construct guarded bisimilar companion structures that avoid all incidental Gaifman cliques-thus serving as a partial analogue in finite model theory for the usually infinite guarded unravellings. In hypergraph theoretic terms, we show that every finite hypergraph admits a bisimilar cover by a finite conformal hypergraph. In terms of relational structures, we show that every finite relational structure admits a guarded bisimilar cover by a finite structure whose Gaifman cliques are guarded. One of our applications answers an open question about a clique constrained strengthening of the extension property for partial automorphisms (EPPA) of Hrushovski, Herwig and Lascar. A second application provides an alternative proof of the finite model property (FMP) for the clique guarded fragment of first-order logic CGF, by reducing (finite) satisfiability in CGF to (finite) satisfiability in the guarded fragment, GF
|Keywords||finite model theory extension property for partial isomorphisms guarded logics finite model property|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ian Hodkinson (2006). Complexity of Monodic Guarded Fragments Over Linear and Real Time. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 138 (1):94-125.
Martin Otto (2004). Modal and Guarded Characterisation Theorems Over Finite Transition Systems. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 130 (1-3):173-205.
Martin Otto (2013). Expressive Completeness Through Logically Tractable Models. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (12):1418-1453.
Similar books and articles
C. J. van Alten & J. G. Raftery (1999). The Finite Model Property for the Implicational Fragment of IPC Without Exchange and Contraction. Studia Logica 63 (2):213-222.
Erich Grädel (1999). On the Restraining Power of Guards. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1719-1742.
C. J. Van Alten & J. G. Raftery (1999). The Finite Model Property for the Implicational Fragment of IPC Without Exchange and Contraction. Studia Logica 63 (2):213 - 222.
Koichiro Ikeda (2001). Minimal but Not Strongly Minimal Structures with Arbitrary Finite Dimensions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):117-126.
Eva Hoogland & Maarten Marx (2002). Interpolation and Definability in Guarded Fragments. Studia Logica 70 (3):373 - 409.
Yuri Gurevich & Saharon Shelah (1996). On Finite Rigid Structures. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (2):549-562.
Jörg Flum & Martin Ziegler (1999). Pseudo-Finite Homogeneïty and Saturation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1689-1699.
Ross Willard (1994). Hereditary Undecidability of Some Theories of Finite Structures. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (4):1254-1262.
H. Andréka, I. Hodkinson & I. Németi (1999). Finite Algebras of Relations Are Representable on Finite Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):243-267.
Ian Hodkinson (2002). Loosely Guarded Fragment of First-Order Logic has the Finite Model Property. Studia Logica 70 (2):205 - 240.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #138,465 of 1,102,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #24,541 of 1,102,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?